Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Alternative Hubble topic
#1
Hubble does'nt exist. It's a fake.
John
Reply
#2
John:

You should really add "TIC" (tongue in cheek) to your signature when you're being sarky! Otherwise a certain village idiot will think you agree with his nut-case views!

Frank


Frank
Frank Damp (wife Eileen, nee Nixon)
Leyland resident 1941-1965, emigrated to the US in 1968,
retired to Anacortes, Washington State, USA in 1999.
Reply
#3
I know that this should be on the other thread, but I didn`t want to start up the argument again.
The other day I watched (for the umpteenth time)the program debunking the landing conspiracies. It`s claimed that the flag couldn`t have waved as there is no air on the moon. Not only does air create movement, it also PREVENTS it. Therefore - no air - no pressure to stop physical movement.
Unfortunately, as the proverb goes, `There are none so blind as those who do not want to see`.
Jim
Reply
#4
quote:

Originally posted by anacortesdamp

John:

You should really add "TIC" (tongue in cheek) to your signature when you're being sarky! Otherwise a certain village idiot will think you agree with his nut-case views!

Frank


Frank




Richard Head has spoken !! [|)]
Reply
#5
Sadly Phil whilst you keep prattling on about how you think the USA made up the moon landing that's how some will perceive you.
Reply
#6
The ironic thing is that this thread is about Hubble and I hadn't added anything to it until I felt I had to retaliate to that American geezer who used to live here about 50 years ago ! So who is prattling on ? And besides I might be the only one on here bar Sandra who doubts the lunar landings but 25% of us Brits also doubt them !
http://blog.taragana.com/pr/it-may-be-th...moon-3870/
Reply
#7
Sorry, It`s my fault that this has spread out over two threads. As I said, I`d dropped a comment on here in order to AVOID arguments.
Jim
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)